Theologians deliver multiple knock out blows to Matthew Vines’ gay christian ideology

TKOThe results are in: Truth Wins Out and Matthew Vines’ weak gay christian ideology is knocked out cold.

Although a featherweight could have taken down the childish lore of Matthew Vines’ theology du jour, it was interesting to watch the fight which was quickly over in round one.

Read or download the free e-book entitled God and the Gay Christian: a Evangelical response to Matthew Vines. The book was edited by  Dr. Albert Mohler.

Also check out other articles that have laid waste to the notion of gay christianity, Matthew Vines’ accursed theological candy and how it will never change or alter the truth. Matthew Vines is a shooting star destined to utterly fail just like all before him who have challenged God’s eternal word. Whether by hook or crook, or outright threat, they have all failed miserably with much evidence to prove it. That’s why I lose no sleep over this latest heretic in training. We all know that after every pretender has been vanquished Truth will stand without equal.

 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than what you have received, let him be accursed. Galatians 1:8,9

Related Posts with Thumbnails

2 Responses to Theologians deliver multiple knock out blows to Matthew Vines’ gay christian ideology

  1. Erik Wait says:

    Although I read 70+ books by Gay Theologians while doing research for my book “Do Not Be Deceived” I haven’t read Matthew Vines’ book yet but probably will in the near future. However, I did listen to an interview with him on the the Gay Christian Network (GCN) podcast and he was essentially making the “Paul was homo-ignorant” argument which asserts that Paul had no knowledge of “loving committed monogamous gay relationships” and so in Romans 1 and 1 Corinthians 6:9 he could only be referring to the drunken Roman Bacchanalia orgies. I respond to this argument in greater length in my book, but in short the problem with this argument is that these Gay Theologians will argue that Ruth & Naomi, David & Jonathan and others were in such a relationship and if so, how could Paul be “homo-ignorant.”? Secondly, extra-Biblical historical evidence clearly shows that mutual consenting man-man and man-boy relationships were common and the woman-woman conduct described in Romans 1 was not part of the Roman orgies.

  2. Exgay2 says:

    What we Christians have to do is make up our minds and say that God has said it. I believe it. And that settles it. The devil put doubt about what God told Adam in the Garden of Eden into Eve’s head. She doubted what God said to Adam and made him doubt also. Those who don’t know the Truth or know Jesus Christ as their personal Lord and Savior can do nothing but doubt. We Christians have to decide whether we believe the Bible, God’s infallible word, or books written by men who don’t know Jesus Christ or God. For me, this subject has been settled when I asked for forgiveness of my Sin, the one Adam and Eve brought on mankind, and repented. Mr. Vines can study the Bible all he wants but that doesn’t make him an expert. The things of the spirit are foolish to the natural man for they are spiritual discerned.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>