Comments on: The impact of the false inclusion doctrine http://www.gcmwatch.com/4118/the-impact-of-the-false-doctrine-of-inclusion Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:09:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Lafe http://www.gcmwatch.com/4118/the-impact-of-the-false-doctrine-of-inclusion/comment-page-1#comment-12483 Lafe Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:59:21 +0000 http://www.gcmwatch.com/?p=4118#comment-12483 People of the Book: As long as we follows Jesus' example of honoring his Word...He will take care of the rest and not allow His Word to return to Him void. Jesus never compromised His message to receive the approval of the crowd. He never did anything trying to anticipate a good pat on the back or a welcome into someone's home. Jesus never played politics for what it could get him. Jesus and His message stood alone and were empowered by God to be a stumbling block to those who would not believe Him to be the promised Messiah. When you compare the stance of Jesus with many of today's pulpiteers who are watering down the gospel for the sake of approval or expediency or to be welcomed into certain monied or political circles, you will only then understand why Jesus told the rich young ruler what he said and that was: no need to compromise my message..if you do not like it...walk. God is sovereign and we miss that aspect of his glory. We sometimes think that we are an invaulable cog that God needs to advance His kingdom. Wrong! God can raise up the stones to testify to Him if so needed. Hopefully, what that does is humble us to realize that apart from the Vine, we can do nothing of significance in the flesh that impresses God. When a false gospel is preached...e.g. Your Best Life Now...you know that it is a another gospel that God does not approve of since it is contra to his Word of dying out to self. Your Best Life Now glorifies the efforts of mankind to improve their self image and to "motor along" in this life as if there is no judgment for the deeds done in the flesh. The false gospel of that we are "little gods" (Copeland/Hagin/ Dollar/Price...etc) also denigrates the Word of God since it too states that we can alter our realities to suit our fancy and that obeying God is optional and as "little gods" we can reign and rule in our own kingdoms and not submit to the Kingdom of God. Although God desires all to come to repentance, He is not watering down the requirements so He can get big numbers. That is for the seeker sensitive churches to dilute the Gospel message and make you feel that you can pick and choose your method of reaching God as you so desire. God's standards are not relative but firm and fixed. People of the Book: As long as we follows Jesus’ example of honoring his Word…He will take care of the rest and not allow His Word to return to Him void.
Jesus never compromised His message to receive the approval of the crowd. He never did anything trying to anticipate a good pat on the back or a welcome into someone’s home.
Jesus never played politics for what it could get him. Jesus and His message stood alone and were empowered by God to be a stumbling block to those who would not believe Him to be the promised Messiah.
When you compare the stance of Jesus with many of today’s pulpiteers who are watering down the gospel for the sake of approval or expediency or to be welcomed into certain monied or
political circles, you will only then understand why Jesus told the rich young ruler what he said and that was: no need to compromise my message..if you do not like it…walk.
God is sovereign and we miss that aspect of his glory. We sometimes think that we are an invaulable cog that God needs to
advance His kingdom. Wrong! God can raise up the stones to testify to Him if so needed.
Hopefully, what that does is humble us to realize that apart from the Vine, we can do nothing of significance in the flesh that impresses God.
When a false gospel is preached…e.g. Your Best Life Now…you know that it is a another gospel that God does not approve of since it is contra to his Word of dying out to self. Your Best Life Now glorifies the efforts of mankind to improve their self image and to “motor along” in this life as if there is no judgment for the deeds done in the flesh.
The false gospel of that we are “little gods” (Copeland/Hagin/
Dollar/Price…etc) also denigrates the Word of God since it too
states that we can alter our realities to suit our fancy and that
obeying God is optional and as “little gods” we can reign and rule
in our own kingdoms and not submit to the Kingdom of God.
Although God desires all to come to repentance, He is not watering down the requirements so He can get big numbers. That is for the seeker sensitive churches to dilute the Gospel message and make you feel that you can pick and choose your method of reaching God as you so desire.
God’s standards are not relative but firm and fixed.

]]> By: BlancheRP http://www.gcmwatch.com/4118/the-impact-of-the-false-doctrine-of-inclusion/comment-page-1#comment-12476 BlancheRP Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:25:06 +0000 http://www.gcmwatch.com/?p=4118#comment-12476 Inclusion. Just another label for rebellion, arrogance and pride. "Inclusion" is just what sinful, rebellious humans want to hear. Just like those of Jesus' time, they're all for you when you dish out the fish and the loaves but watch out when you start making demands regarding holiness and righteous living. "Inclusion", in other words, is just another word for humanism. Inclusion. Just another label for rebellion, arrogance and pride. “Inclusion” is just what sinful, rebellious humans want to hear. Just like those of Jesus’ time, they’re all for you when you dish out the fish and the loaves but watch out when you start making demands regarding holiness and righteous living. “Inclusion”, in other words, is just another word for humanism.

]]> By: Godlysoldier http://www.gcmwatch.com/4118/the-impact-of-the-false-doctrine-of-inclusion/comment-page-1#comment-12460 Godlysoldier Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:58:47 +0000 http://www.gcmwatch.com/?p=4118#comment-12460 Touche' lapreghiera. @Job, excellent, excellent! I too was just reading that this past weekend! Once the "crowd" saw that Jesus' teachings were "exclusive", the "crowd" began to grow thinner and thinner! Feed us, repeat the miracles that you did for the other folks, perform for us they cried. Oh but when they were actually challenged to live according to Jesus way,thus the broad road got broader and the narrow road more narrow! Is it not any different than what we are seeing today! My my my! Yes, preach on my brother's, preach on! Touche’ lapreghiera. @Job, excellent, excellent! I too was just reading that this past weekend! Once the “crowd” saw that Jesus’ teachings were “exclusive”, the “crowd” began to grow thinner and thinner! Feed us, repeat the miracles that you did for the other folks, perform for us they cried. Oh but when they were actually challenged to live according to Jesus way,thus the broad road got broader and the narrow road more narrow! Is it not any different than what we are seeing today! My my my!
Yes, preach on my brother’s, preach on!

]]> By: lapreghiera http://www.gcmwatch.com/4118/the-impact-of-the-false-doctrine-of-inclusion/comment-page-1#comment-12435 lapreghiera Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:57:50 +0000 http://www.gcmwatch.com/?p=4118#comment-12435 Enjoying this lesson in the comments. Preach on brothers!! Enjoying this lesson in the comments. Preach on brothers!!

]]> By: Job http://www.gcmwatch.com/4118/the-impact-of-the-false-doctrine-of-inclusion/comment-page-1#comment-12433 Job Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:12:59 +0000 http://www.gcmwatch.com/?p=4118#comment-12433 gcmwatch: Yep. In addition to that Canaanite woman (I read about it just last night in Matthew!) there were other people who got upset that Jesus Christ wanted to preach to them. They only wanted Him to perform miracles and heal them and were uninterested in following and obeying Him, and if I recall correctly stated that He was obligated to heal them because they were Jews and He was a Jewish prophet. When Jesus Christ replied that Elijah kept alive a Gentile woman during a famine while Jewish women starved, they got angry and rejected Him! Jesus Christ never bent over backwards to try to "include" anyone. Quite the other hand, He did the opposite. He only joined Himself to those who believed in Him and were willing to obey Him. gcmwatch:

Yep. In addition to that Canaanite woman (I read about it just last night in Matthew!) there were other people who got upset that Jesus Christ wanted to preach to them. They only wanted Him to perform miracles and heal them and were uninterested in following and obeying Him, and if I recall correctly stated that He was obligated to heal them because they were Jews and He was a Jewish prophet. When Jesus Christ replied that Elijah kept alive a Gentile woman during a famine while Jewish women starved, they got angry and rejected Him!

Jesus Christ never bent over backwards to try to “include” anyone. Quite the other hand, He did the opposite. He only joined Himself to those who believed in Him and were willing to obey Him.

]]> By: gcmwatch http://www.gcmwatch.com/4118/the-impact-of-the-false-doctrine-of-inclusion/comment-page-1#comment-12430 gcmwatch Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:18:25 +0000 http://www.gcmwatch.com/?p=4118#comment-12430 Thats an excellent and very accurate observation about Jesus-Judas! Jesus practiced an exclusion to the point of denying people deliverance. Reference the Syrophoenician woman in Mark 7. Jesus only relented when her faith far exceeded her request. In other words acceptance is on his terms, not ours. In every case where he encountered with someone outside of his people (John 1:21), it was clear they had to engage him on his terms. None of them came to him telling him they deserved some "seat at the table". In fact, most times it was a plea for his mercy. Inclusion religion is about as arrogant and pharasaic as it gets. Thats an excellent and very accurate observation about Jesus-Judas! Jesus practiced an exclusion to the point of denying people deliverance. Reference the Syrophoenician woman in Mark 7. Jesus only relented when her faith far exceeded her request. In other words acceptance is on his terms, not ours. In every case where he encountered with someone outside of his people (John 1:21), it was clear they had to engage him on his terms. None of them came to him telling him they deserved some “seat at the table”. In fact, most times it was a plea for his mercy.

Inclusion religion is about as arrogant and pharasaic as it gets.

]]>