Comments on: SOTUS sends signal to military chaplains http://www.gcmwatch.com/4407/the-savior-in-chief Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:09:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: gcmwatch http://www.gcmwatch.com/4407/the-savior-in-chief/comment-page-1#comment-14404 gcmwatch Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:12:16 +0000 http://www.gcmwatch.com/?p=4407#comment-14404 Jeff, no one is avoiding anything. It is interesting however, that while you want to steer the conversation to homosexuals, you are mum on the presidents unConstitutional signal to bible believeing chaplains. So before you get your question answered, why not answer why the fake savior is trying to stop the truth about homosexuality? Jeff, no one is avoiding anything. It is interesting however, that while you want to steer the conversation to homosexuals, you are mum on the presidents unConstitutional signal to bible believeing chaplains.

So before you get your question answered, why not answer why the fake savior is trying to stop the truth about homosexuality?

]]> By: Ya Ya http://www.gcmwatch.com/4407/the-savior-in-chief/comment-page-1#comment-14363 Ya Ya Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:05:34 +0000 http://www.gcmwatch.com/?p=4407#comment-14363 No surprise here! SOTUS only nicknamed his personal vehicle in the presidential motorcade "The Beast" He's one banana peel away from falling right on over into the enemies hands. Pray for our leader because we are living in America and whatever punishment he brings upon this country unless the rapture comes first we are gonna reap what has been sown. On an interesting note. I overheard a scientist on a news show mention that due to the two powerful earthquakes that we have had close together, the poles has shifted a bit and the length of the day although imperceptible has actually shortened. In my mind I think the more stronger earthquakes we have the more likely it is for the poles to slip out of position, and the length of the day to fall out of synchronicity with our watches. Didn't the word say something about the shortening of the day, lest their be no flesh left? (paraphrased) this scientifically makes sense. "A 6.7 earthquake is 900 times more powerful than a 4.7 earthquake. So the energy released to top the energy of a 4.7 earthquake would require 900, 4.7 earthquakes on the Richter scale which is logarithmic. Each whole number represents a 30 fold increase" (USGS) With the Haitian quake and then the Chilean quake, it's not that far fetched to believe the earth has developed a bit of a wobble, enough to throw things off a bit. Is this going to be on the news? No.. because it would be fulfillment of prophecy and the government doesn't want to authenticate the bible, if anything it wants to make the bible into a lie and bring everyone under the umbrella of a one world Luciferian ,homosexual, humanitarian, secularism mumbo jumbo religion. There are more people, fighting for the rights of animals, trees, bugs and homosexuals, than children, the elderly, homeless and sick. G. Craig Lewis once said and I don't think this quote is his but he did say, "whatever the head does in moderation the body will do in excess". Our head, Our president, has a reckless disregard for all things sacred and the country is closely following suit. We better hope the days are getting shorter. Sorry for saying so much. ~anointed No surprise here! SOTUS only nicknamed his personal vehicle in the presidential motorcade “The Beast” He’s one banana peel away from falling right on over into the enemies hands. Pray for our leader because we are living in America and whatever punishment he brings upon this country unless the rapture comes first we are gonna reap what has been sown. On an interesting note. I overheard a scientist on a news show mention that due to the two powerful earthquakes that we have had close together, the poles has shifted a bit and the length of the day although imperceptible has actually shortened. In my mind I think the more stronger earthquakes we have the more likely it is for the poles to slip out of position, and the length of the day to fall out of synchronicity with our watches. Didn’t the word say something about the shortening of the day, lest their be no flesh left? (paraphrased) this scientifically makes sense. “A 6.7 earthquake is 900 times more powerful than a 4.7 earthquake. So the energy released to top the energy of a 4.7 earthquake would require 900, 4.7 earthquakes on the Richter scale which is logarithmic. Each whole number represents a 30 fold increase” (USGS) With the Haitian quake and then the Chilean quake, it’s not that far fetched to believe the earth has developed a bit of a wobble, enough to throw things off a bit. Is this going to be on the news? No.. because it would be fulfillment of prophecy and the government doesn’t want to authenticate the bible, if anything it wants to make the bible into a lie and bring everyone under the umbrella of a one world Luciferian ,homosexual, humanitarian, secularism mumbo jumbo religion. There are more people, fighting for the rights of animals, trees, bugs and homosexuals, than children, the elderly, homeless and sick. G. Craig Lewis once said and I don’t think this quote is his but he did say, “whatever the head does in moderation the body will do in excess”. Our head, Our president, has a reckless disregard for all things sacred and the country is closely following suit. We better hope the days are getting shorter. Sorry for saying so much.
~anointed

]]> By: Tony Davis http://www.gcmwatch.com/4407/the-savior-in-chief/comment-page-1#comment-14285 Tony Davis Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:14:50 +0000 http://www.gcmwatch.com/?p=4407#comment-14285 Jeff, I will attempt to answer your questions w/the finite knowlege given me by Christ, and I say that, not knowing whether or not you be a believer or not. In the Old Testament, when God was forming the armies of Israel, men who had "faint" hearts were not allowed in the army, due to this could be a hinderance to the rest of the men, and cause caution where there was already caution and remove/hinder bravery and courage. Know there was no attempt to make those who were faint hearted fill any less than a man I might add nor was it encouraged. Now I'm an ex-Marine, and I'm not against hetorsexual women being in the military, but however I'm against them being on the "fighting" line due to the simple fact somethings are for women and somethings are for men and thats not saying there aren't brave and courageous women, on the contrary. But homosexual men and women, can cause tremendous hinderances and distrations that can breakdown morale, fighting spirit, or should I say a military quote, "espirit de corps." The hatred that would arise out of the heart of those who despise this sexual orientation could create definetly more harm than good. And thats the key phrase, more "harm than good" whether your for it or not, one cannot be blind, unless purposing to be blind to the effects of this. There are hetorsexuals whose place is not the military, so I speak not only as one against homosexuals in the military, but against anyone who this is not for, let me speak plainly not everything is for everybody and I speak that not just as a christian, but as a human being. Jeff, I spoke as plainly on this issue as I could, not claiming to be an expert on it. The issue for me is not whether or not there are brave and courageous homosexuals, but the inconsistencies, harm, and distration this creates in the military force whether it be this country or another. Theres a possibility you will not agree w/my view, as I would not agree w/the view of one whose for homosexuals in the military, but I know I speak the commandments of God, but also I believe I speak of the "natural" order of things. Jeff,

I will attempt to answer your questions w/the finite knowlege given me by Christ, and I say that, not knowing whether or not you be a believer or not. In the Old Testament, when God was forming the armies of Israel, men who had “faint” hearts were not allowed in the army, due to this could be a hinderance to the rest of the men, and cause caution where there was already caution and remove/hinder bravery and courage. Know there was no attempt to make those who were faint hearted fill any less than a man I might add nor was it encouraged. Now I’m an ex-Marine, and I’m not against hetorsexual women being in the military, but however I’m against them being on the “fighting” line due to the simple fact somethings are for women and somethings are for men and thats not saying there aren’t brave and courageous women, on the contrary.

But homosexual men and women, can cause tremendous hinderances and distrations that can breakdown morale, fighting spirit, or should I say a military quote, “espirit de corps.” The hatred that would arise out of the heart of those who despise this sexual orientation could create definetly more harm than good. And thats the key phrase, more “harm than good” whether your for it or not, one cannot be blind, unless purposing to be blind to the effects of this. There are hetorsexuals whose place is not the military, so I speak not only as one against homosexuals in the military, but against anyone who this is not for, let me speak plainly not everything is for everybody and I speak that not just as a christian, but as a human being.

Jeff, I spoke as plainly on this issue as I could, not claiming to be an expert on it. The issue for me is not whether or not there are brave and courageous homosexuals, but the inconsistencies, harm, and distration this creates in the military force whether it be this country or another. Theres a possibility you will not agree w/my view, as I would not agree w/the view of one whose for homosexuals in the military, but I know I speak the commandments of God, but also I believe I speak of the “natural” order of things.

]]> By: Jeff http://www.gcmwatch.com/4407/the-savior-in-chief/comment-page-1#comment-14279 Jeff Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:42:33 +0000 http://www.gcmwatch.com/?p=4407#comment-14279 What is interesting is that no one here has said with any real evidence how openly gay men and women in the military will be a hinderance and that is the real question. But then no one is addressing the fact that there are 25 nations who right now have openly gay men and women serving in the military. Lies, sterotypes, and illusions on what it means to be a gay man or woman need to be addressed but I have to ask will anyone here be willing to address these with honesty and integrity? What is interesting is that no one here has said with any real evidence how openly gay men and women in the military will be a hinderance and that is the real question. But then no one is addressing the fact that there are 25 nations who right now have openly gay men and women serving in the military. Lies, sterotypes, and illusions on what it means to be a gay man or woman need to be addressed but I have to ask will anyone here be willing to address these with honesty and integrity?

]]> By: gcmwatch http://www.gcmwatch.com/4407/the-savior-in-chief/comment-page-1#comment-14084 gcmwatch Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:49:50 +0000 http://www.gcmwatch.com/?p=4407#comment-14084 Yeah, his record (scant and secretive as it was) solidified him as one of the most far left pols ever to walk halls of Congress. Plus, Ive <a href="http://www.gcmwatch.com/1872/prophetic-affirmation-from-alan-keyes" rel="nofollow">said it before</a>. Barry Soetero aka SOTUS aka POTUS Barack Obama is a terribly confused child who has been given the house and the checkbook for the weekend. WHY God allowed it I believe is a mix of the things I mentioned above. You may be right about his intent for broader military expansion, however my hope is that this nightmare ends in 2012. Yeah, his record (scant and secretive as it was) solidified him as one of the most far left pols ever to walk halls of Congress.

Plus, Ive said it before. Barry Soetero aka SOTUS aka POTUS Barack Obama is a terribly confused child who has been given the house and the checkbook for the weekend.

WHY God allowed it I believe is a mix of the things I mentioned above.

You may be right about his intent for broader military expansion, however my hope is that this nightmare ends in 2012.

]]> By: Kyle http://www.gcmwatch.com/4407/the-savior-in-chief/comment-page-1#comment-14083 Kyle Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:31:43 +0000 http://www.gcmwatch.com/?p=4407#comment-14083 PF, I don't disagree with you. I just wanted to look at it from a different angle as to "why" Barry would do such a thing. I think the fact that he is very liberal is the obvious reason. However, I think the extension of openness to homosexuals may be for a broader agenda including greater military expansion. Either case it is still an abomination. Or is it Obamanation? Kyle PF,

I don’t disagree with you. I just wanted to look at it from a different angle as to “why” Barry would do such a thing.

I think the fact that he is very liberal is the obvious reason. However, I think the extension of openness to homosexuals may be for a broader agenda including greater military expansion.

Either case it is still an abomination. Or is it Obamanation?

Kyle

]]>