Category Archives: diapraxy
Kurt Carr Project: false unity and bizarre beliefs
The GospelFlava.com interview with gospel music industry worker Kurt Carr is a very interesting read. Circa 2005, the interview is a promotion of his “One Church” album, but its also a revealing window into the flawed theology motivating industry workers like Carr. Thus, their music becomes a product of their misinterpretation and misapplication of God’s word. First, Carr erroneously claims music is what God will use to bring Christians together.
In my prayer time, while I was seeking God about the new CD, he compelled me to reach those people that he has given their ear to me. That’s where the concept of the album came from. It has a profound message that needs to be conveyed. Jesus prayed to the Father that we would be one, as He and the Father are one. My friend Tommy Tenney said that it’s an unanswered prayer that Jesus prayed. It’s true because there is still so much division in the body of Christ. We have to do something about it, and I believe that music is the key that is going to draw us all together.” [source]
People like Carr seem to see unity and as an end unto itself. That’s one of the key tenets of the diaprax heresy. Consequently, I have 
seen no scriptural basis to support an assertion that music will bring God’s people into true unity. How can that be especially when the main vehicles for releasing such music are infected with sin, compromise and perversity? Look here, here and here for examples. If biblical unity is to be achieved it cannot be based on anything which excludes God’s word as the primary unifier.
But that’s only one of the rather unsettling beliefs Carr reveals in this interview. He complains that African Americans “dont pay enough homage” to our ancestors compared to the Jews. When asked by GF why he felt it so important to show “props” to people who paved the way for him, Carr claimed his “homage” to James Cleveland and Walter Hawkins was to make amends for our lack of ancestor connectedness.
I feel that it’s crucial to do that. To me, that’s what is wrong with our people. We don’t give enough respect and homage to our ancestors. Take the Jews for instance. I grew up in Connecticut, and I went to a private school there. It was mostly —I would say 98% —Jewish. I am real familiar with the Jewish culture, and how their whole lives are about their ancestors, their families, their background. Every week in school, we would hear something about the Holocaust. Unfortunately, our people are not as set on that. We talk about it, but whatever.
So, if the church was more like Jews and learned to respect and honor people like Cleveland despite his evil legacy, then God would unite us? Im not sure about you, but I wasn’t aware that Cleveland, Hawkins and [Albertina] Walker had been elevated to ancestor status in the black community. The problem with Carr’s analogy is that Jews murdered in the Holocaust were innocent victims of a madman. James Cleveland had a sexual demon. We know he infected at least one young man with AIDS and corrupted the lives of countless others. That’s worthy of “respect and honor”?
Then there’s Carr’s bizarre comparison to Michael Jackson in the interview.
One time I went to do a workshop in Japan, and there were about 800 people in the choir. I couldn’t believe it. When I walked out on stage, they were acting like I was Michael Jackson. Girls were fainting. It was crazy. God showed me, “I’m not doing this to edify you. I’m doing this that you can edify me.” A lot of those people sing the music, but they’re not Christians. God used us that night. The anointing fell. People were speaking in tongues, and didn’t realize what they were doing. They don’t even understand what I am saying, but it’s the music —the substance and the heart of the music —that’s going to change them and lead them to conversion.”
Non Christians were speaking in tongues and didn’t know it? Carr says the [Japanese] people had no clue about what he was saying, but that “the music” changed them. That’s not how the scripture says it should happen. For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things! Romans 10:13-15
I’m not sure what disturbs me more: the blatant false beliefs or the Michael Jackson comparisons.
After Jackson’s pedophilia trial, Carr sent out an email promo saying that God was on Jackson’s side. Further, he claimed “God obviously has a work for Michael Jackson to do.” Of course you know Jackson later fled to Bahrain and converted to Islam one week after being sued by Sheikh Abdulla bin Hamad Al Khalifa for $7 million. Abdulla contends he gave a broke Jackson the money to help him after his trial.
In the articles, Carr drops familiar names that have appeared here on GCM Watch. Look at the connections and see for yourself this is not of God. This idolatrous music uses Jesus’ name, but in practice they deny him. From such, turn away. Carr has a new album out now entitled “Just the beginning”. We’ll be watching to see what he says is his motivation behind this one.
New UDIHR controversy developments
Some interesting new developments in the controversy over Bishop Charles Blake’s endorsement of the Universal Declaration of International Human Rights and the so-called Faith in Human Rights Statement.
COGIC has changed the web link for the third time. We’re not sure what that’s about but hopefully they are finished tinkering with their response. In the latest revision to the original 22 page document, the church cites a recent African case using the UDIHR as a basis for legal action. Such a citation, they assert, is proof the statement is only about protecting egregious human rights abuses and nothing else.
The original Declaration provides a basis by which the International Criminal Court has ordered the arrest of President Omar al‐Bashir of Sudan for his complicity and leadership in the murder of 300,000 Africans, and the displacement of 2.5 million Africans from their homes in Darfur.”
And COGIC (Use of the denominational acronym is only because its not clear exactly who’s writing these responses) asserts again that the word “homosexual” nor the phrase “homosexual marriage” was mentioned in the document(s) which is further proof that our claims are “malicious lies, …for devious ulterior motives”.
Technically, they are correct. As a matter of fact, Bishop Blake and those writing for him have framed their entire defense only on technicalities. Its not a trump because (1) GCM Watch never made a claim that the word or the phrase is explicity mentioned in either of the documents. As a matter of fact we said it was an implied endorsement and (2) Technical arguements are problematic. Think of the gay christian arguement that “Jesus said nothing about homosexuality”. Technically true, but false due to motive. Our original perspective was an interpretive one based on research which shows the document is used (and intended) to be interpreted in its broadest application which is of course inclusive of homosexual marriage rights.
Unfortunately, COGIC refuses to acknowledge the rather obvious existence of this reality.
Having said that, let’s examine this claim as if it were true. If one can argue that the IDUHR is a document which is a basis for human rights abuses, claims and applications, then the question must be asked does it cover all human rights abuses, claims and applications. Even if we do not agree with other parties’ claims on the application of the IDUHR does that nullify its intent? As much as I would like to say the humanist document doesnt apply to gay marriage, it does.
Also in Africa, the UDIHR was cited as the basis of his awarding a legal victory. This one was for homosexuals in Uganda.
Justice Arach called upon the international conventions and emphasised that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights enjoins us to respect and protect them in a spirit of brotherhood, which includes sisterhood.” The final judgement on the case was issued yesterday to a court full of Ugandan lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex people. Counsel Rwakafuzi recounted the historic moment that occurred yesterday when Justice Arach declared: ‘Human rights must be respected. It has been found that the actions of the officials that molested Victor Mukasa and Oyoo were unconstitutional, inhuman, and should be condemned.’
While the judge accurately applied the UDIHR to the particular case, the plaintiff described the ruling as “one leg inside victory”.
“The fact that the Ugandan High Court is relying on international human rights conventions is a good sign that justice will come to everyone in Uganda some day”, said Victor Musaka.
Thus, the UDIHR is understood by the international community which subscribes to it to be fluid and encompassing of a plethora ofa gay rights. What are gay rights? Well just ask the gay community. We’ve already cited their near universal agreement that homosexual marriage is a fundamental human right. Its the same argument being used in this country and was successful in both Massachusetts and Connecticutt.
At the ceremony, attended by David Hall, COGIC’s emissary, one speaker emphasized the all inclusiveness of the Faith Statement and the UDIHR.
Again, there was no verbatim utterance of the h-word. But given his anti-church support of homosexual rights, there’s no mistaking what Maxime Jacques Marcel Verhagen, the Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs meant to convey in his speech to the cosigns of the Faith Statement.
When the Catholic church refused to endorse a UN initiative on gay rights, Verhagen summoned the Papal Nuncio of the Netherlands and publicly chided him for not falling in line with the Dutch government. The Catholic church refused endorsement because it understood that the document went beyond the goal of ending violence against people.
When Verhagen addressed the signatories of the Faith Statement (of which Dr. Hall was in attendance) he told them in no uncertain terms that all rights meant all rights and all people meant all people.
It transposes important values, such as justice, equality, human dignity and liberty, into rights to which everyone is entitled. These are the birthright of all human beings; regardless of where they were born or to what cultural or religious tradition they belong. They reflect our common humanity, from which no person may be excluded.”
Although COGIC argues in its defense that they only signed to fight “suffering, abuse, and extremism”, Verhagen clearly articulated to them at the time that “…no restrictions may be placed on human rights in the name of religion”. The foreign minister then tells Dr. Hall that his religion (COGIC) may not interpret human rights to mean something different than everyone else.
There are people who argue that human rights can be interpreted differently within different religious traditions. I believe that such relativism seriously undermines the international human rights legal system. So I am very glad that you, as representatives of different world religions, are endorsing the Universal Declaration today and proclaiming that your religions recognise and support human rights and fundamental freedoms for everyone, irrespective of religion. You are telling the world that religion and human rights are not conflict, that in fact religion can be a major source of legitimacy for human rights.”
Plain and simple it is the concept of univeralism or diaprax in this case of a religious umbrella that is being applied to this entire event. Consequently, if COGIC signs onto the statement then comes back home and says we dont interpret it to mean that, someone either is being disengenuous, duplictious or grossly uninformed.
Read Verhagen’s entire speech to the signatories of the Faith in Human Rights Statement. Its rather stunning considering the context of what has been discussed thus far.
In the shadows of secularism?
Easter is more about the easter bunny than the supernatural resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Christmas is more about presents from santa than celebrating the supernatural arrival of the Messiah
Thanksgiving seems to be more about what’s for dinner than giving honor to God.
Are we slowly but surely losing our foundations? Some churches have begun competing with halloween by holding “hallelujah nights”. One pastor said “the kids need something to keep their attention”.
Just a few holiday examples, but is it a sign of what’s to come? Many Christian churches incorporate the more secular components of the holidays or “Holy Days” in order to appeal to people who arent religious. However, some believe that this is only helping to hasten the time when our faith will be a footnote of a period of intolerance and exclusion.
Just this week, the American Religious Identification Survey released their findings which revealed continuing declines of people who self identify as “Christian” or “evangelical” while those who claim no religion at all and those who embrace pagan religion, have risen. Pentecostal religion grew by 3.5 percent.
Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair told a UK paper that Christianity is at risk of being sidelined in England’s increasingly secular society. Charisma Magazine reported Blair ”said he agreed with church leaders that Christianity is in danger of being viewed as a “personal eccentricity” rather than a significant influence on the nation.”
In short, Christianity is in danger of becoming a something akin to women who still like to wear their hair big like in the 80s.
True and given, God has a remnant that “hasnt bowed the knee to Baal” and his word will never fail. But what of this organization called the Christian church? Is it destined to be swallowed by a one world system?
In an earlier report, we looked at how the harlot church is developing right alongside the true church and at some points threatning to overshadow it. Many false ideologies are slowly merging with biblical concepts and creating a new thought stream throughout the church. Like the holidays mentioned, these concepts sound good, feel good and even look good on paper, but where is it leading us? In recent years, we’ve experienced surges of extentialism, humanism, hybrid ecumenicalism, extreme pacifism, universalism and diaprax. That’s just to name a few. Some of them are old heresies with new names. Though there are many questions, what’s clear is that we’ve got much to contend for as well as against.
Bishop Blake releases UDIHR defense
We are extremely disappointed but perhaps we had little hope to expect much more.
Through his public relations firm, Bishop Charles Blake has released what appears to be a response to our articles here and here sharply criticizing his endorsement of the Universal Declaration of International Human Rights and the Faith in Human Rights Statement.
The 22 page document is posted on the denomination’s main website. Read it.
GCM Watch intends to issue a full examination of the response later on this site.
Bishop Charles Blake endorses gay marriage declaration
A Special GCM Watch Report. COGIC leader signs onto document affirming universal rights to homosexual marriage.
- Bishop Charles Blake endorses gay marriage declaration
- Humanism blackens Blake speech
- Bishop Blake releases UDIHR defense
- An unholy covenant: our response to Bishop Blake’s defense document
- New UDIHR controversy developments
- UN document advocates gay marriage; pedophile access
Just over two months ago, Bishop Charles Blake appointed Dr. David Hall, a midlevel church official, as his “official emissary” to the signing of the Universal Declaration of International Human Rights . The Faith in Human Rights Statement was issued in conjunction with the anniversary of the UDIHR.
The Memphis-based Tri State Defender said Blake’s invitation came at the behest of The Netherlands Queen Beatrix whose nation in 2001 was the first to grant full marriage rights to homosexuals. Queen Beatrix assembled this diverse religious gathering on the 60th anniversary of the document’s signing. And everyone was giddy with ecumenical joy. But peel away the feel good humanism and you are left with a bizarre collusion of world religions and political religionists whose goal is to enact universal law governing humanity and its “rights”. According to the Tri-State Defender:
The meeting took place in the Peace Palace during the International Inter-religious Faith in Human Rights Conference. Sponsored by The Carnegie Foundation and the government of The Netherlands, the event attracted an entourage of 10 supreme authorities of various world religions, political leaders, heads of state, and high-level UN officials.
Invitees were asked to sign the 2008 Faith in Human Rights Statement, which, in essence, pronounces and confirms that true religion, irrespective of religion, gender, race or other distinctions, defends the human rights and fundamental freedoms of every human. [source]
Blake, in a video message aired at the event, could barely conceal his excitement at this opportunity to prove his ecumenical credentials.
“As Presiding Bishop of the Church Of God In Christ, International, it is my great honor and privilege to attach my signature to the 2008 Faith in Human Rights Statement. On behalf our 12,000 plus Church of God in Christ congregations in America and in 60 nations of the world, I endorse and encourage the great ideas and ideals of this document.”
The gospel of inclusion, part II
Im curious about this. Although lauded as a monumental occasion, a historic first, not one slither of it was noted on the COGIC’s main website nor any of its subsidary sites. The Tri-State Defender, an African American newspaper with a regional audience and small circulation, was the only publication to carry the story. Why did COGIC only release the information to this small newspaper? Why not the much larger Commercial Appeal which is arguably COGIC-friendly?
Secondly, Im not that familiar with COGIC polity, but does the Presiding Bishop have that much authority to sign up his entire church up for something like this without approval from the General Assembly? After all this is an indirect endorsement of homosexual marriage. Does COGIC really want to reverse the work of GE Patterson? And incidentally, Patterson did need to approval of the GA to issue its historic marriage proclamation. Read it.
Third, what’s in this package of “great ideas and ideals” that would prompt Bishop Blake to shower it with such glowing praise?
For one, the UDIHR (and its accompanying faith statement) is a mark of achievement for homosexual rights advocates who have pressured the United Nations for years to enshrine gay rights into its official positions. Read carefully. Gays want the UN to “afford same-sex partnerships full protection of the law, equal to marital and other legally recognized mixed-sex partnerships, with regard to pension, inheritance, taxation, social security, custody and adoption, donor insemination and other services, in which discriminatory policies and practices currently exist. Additionally homosexuals want to “stimulate the development of positive images of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered people and lifestyles as role models for young people.”
In short, homosexual activists have invested much into the declaration because it would give them broad international leverage against any nation who refused to legislate acceptance of homosexual rights. Armed with the Declaration they could pressure the UN to impose sanctions against such nations. Although the Declaration has no legal power, it nonetheless is a powerful weapon (particularly Article 16) against non-participatory nations.
Calling the general assembly statement a ”powerful victory for the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, the Human Rights Watch gay and lesbian faction said the ”statement confirm[s] that international human rights protections include sexual orientation and gender identity. It is the first time that a statement condemning rights abuses against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people has been presented in the General Assembly.”
The Faith Statement in essence is an extenstion of the UDIHR. What the UDIHR does not address about the religious aspects of human rights, the Faith Statement does. And it follows the same path of securing universal acceptance of homosexual marriage among religious entities.
A snapshot of the antichrist and his false prophet’s world religion
But much more than just an affirmation of basic human rights, the manifesto is a stunning snapshot of what a future one world government and one world religion would look like under the rule of the antichrist. In our opinion this is what characterizes the ecumenical ideology of Bishop Charles Blake. Its dangerous, unbiblical and works against the goals of the kingdom of God.
How could any minister endorse and promote a message of the right to ___________ (fill in the blank)? Should we preach rights or should we preach the message of the kingdom of God? If youre unsure of what that is look here. If you don’t agree with that, let’s try a rewording of the Great Commission to see the effect. Can you imagine Matthew 28: 19-20 rewritten to say this?:
Go into all the world and preach the right to commit sin. Teach them all things that the United Nations has deemed is of human value. Teach them to respect other religions and lifestyles. And most importantly, dont try to change the world, just live in peaceful coexistence with them. Respecting human rights is greater than doctrine or biblical directives. And lo, in return, they’ll respect your religion too. Amen.
You may consider that far fetched but that’s exactly the lie David Hall is pushing with Blake’s approval. “Peace is the way the Lord would want us to live and respect each other’s rights and dignity,” said Hall. “The Human Rights Accord speaks louder than our politics or our religious affiliations. We embraced each other and talked about issues that face humanity.” (our bold)
As you can see the Faith in Human Rights Statement espouses a humanistic “gospel”, contrary to the kingdom of God and its righteousness. It reduces the glory and divinity of our Lord Jesus to the diaprax heresy. It encourages God-less solutions to the issues of humanity, and instead elevates man’s own solution as better than God’s. It arrogantly declares that “true religion” is one where no religion is superior, thus enpowering it to “defend” any ungodly definition of human rights. This is what Charles Blake enthusiastically endorsed.
Above: (left) David Hall, Blake’s special emissary smoozing with “his holiness” Sri Swami Davananda Saraswati who teaches”vedana” a demonic belief that all humanity is divine, thus there is no need for God or Christ. The center picture is of Hall with Muslim Dr. Al-Shekih (center), a representative of Hawza Al-Najaf. Hawza is a Muslim political organization which has been criticized for religious tyranny inside Iraq.
The right picture is of Hall with “his holiness” Drikung Skyabgon, Chetsang Rinpoche, the supreme head of a variation of Tibetan buddhism. Adherents practice what is termed “Phowa”. The practitioner learns how to expel his/her consciousness or mindstream through the fontanel at the top of the skull at the moment of death. This practice is said to aid the practitioner in remaining aware through the death experience, thus aiding one in attaining enlightenment in the Bardo (the state in between death and the next rebirth).
We are supposed to respect these demonic beliefs and encourage people to remained enslaved to this insanity?
And I heard another voice from heaven saying, ‘Come out of her, my people, lest you share in her sins, and lest you receive of her plagues. For her sins have reached to heaven, and God has remembered her iniquities. (Revelation 18:4,5).
Clarification update 03.02.09:
Wiley Henry, a senior staff writer at the Tri-State Defender said the text of the article was submitted by someone who represents COGIC and was edited by TSD staff.
Update 7:45pm Links to faith statement and Bishop Blake’s video message added.
What does the harlot church look like?
Please don’t mistake this as an attempt to specify who could be personified as the harlot church. Its not. Rather, its to open your spiritual sensitivities up to what the harlot church is, does and says. In essense, what is the spirit animating the false church. I hope that you will see that the spirit of the harlot church is in stiff competition with the bride of Christ and many are so confused they are joining the harlot church while despising God’s true church. Today, in our lifetime, the harlot church is racing towards worldwide domination. Babylon seeks to eclipse and ultimately extinguish Zion.
I want you to be fully aware that this site (and others) is being attacked because we are exposing the harlot church and its members. The easy part is that we dont have to create or embellish anything about the harlot church, because the scriptures give us great detail of her perverse passions:
Rev 17:1-7 And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters:
With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.
So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:
And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.
And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.
The harlot church is an endtime perversion of the body of Christ. It offers it all: great “gospel music”, fabulous popular performers, large “ministries”, lots of “love” and tolerance, “nonpunitive” discussions dialogue, nonjudgmental fellowship, good works and a very seductive form of godliness. The harlot church’s address is easy to find: its on broadway. Broadway is a densely populated stretch of spiritual real estate. Its mantra: we are right, because we are many. Consequently, anything small is insignificant and certainly could not represent God.
Thus, the harlot church hates any open criticism of her damnable agenda. The chief demon at her helm counts on massive deception to cover its tracks. This will play out until the very end until the Lord himself exposes her true identity and destroys her.
Size is at the core of the harlot church’s self- justification. She aggrandizes herself and others based on numbers. After all, how could it be so wrong if so many people are following it? Large numbers must mean God’s blessings is on it, right? People are attracted to what is blessed, right?
But the truth about the harlot church of broadway is found in scripture. Jesus himself told us to avoid traveling on the broadway, because it leads to destruction. And take notice of what he says about the numbers:
Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it. Matthew 7:13-14(NKJV)
The values of the harlot church are diametrically opposed to the kingdom of God paradigm. In the kingdom, few are many. The kingdom is represented by a remnant out of the nations and peoples of the earth. In the kingdom, the rule of God is supreme and accepted with great devotion. In God’s kingdom, success equals obedience, not great gain (Joshua 1:8). In the kingdom, one chases a thousand and two, ten thousand. In the kingdom, God’s Word is God’s will.
The great aggregation of happy people who are members of the harlot church are dancing, shouting and singing their way into hell. There are only a few on the road to life. In the wisdom of the worldly, carnal church no one wants to be a part of something thats not popular, or as they put it ”growing”. The harlot church has mastered the “larger is better” model of church because numbers mean everything. In order to attract more and more into her deceptive dance into hell, the harlot church craves the recognition numbers affords her. The more people who gather to “worship” at Broadway Harlot Church, the more “powerful” its proclaimed to be.
The harlot church must appear prosperous at all costs. Canaverous buildings, professional staff with ostentatious sounding titles, celebrity ceo-style pastors, large budgets, worldwide TV programs, technological magic tricks, the hippest music ministers, and connections to the well known. Its a massive marketing tool to get more people onto Broadway and as quickly as possible. The lights, action and camera of religion draw the gullible in like moths to the flame. Biblically, its unrecognizable as a church where Christ is Lord or even present. The message and machination of the prosperity movement cannot lull for even for a second lest someone think that the harlot church isnt what she claims to be.
“The church as we know it today seems a million miles from the New Testament church. That may be a great generalization, but I will stand on it. There is a gulf between our average Christianity and the church of New Testament that makes the Grand Canyon look like a cavity in someone’s tooth.” Leonard Ravenhill
The harlot church is invested with every variation of sexual immorality. That’s why today, those who are in heterosexual sin have no authority to reprove those in homosexual sin. Eventually they will proclaim homosexuality equal and blessed by the god of the harlot church. Those who reject the inclusive new sexual ethic will be persecuted to the fullest extent. Even now, the groundwork is being laid through the false gay christian church. Adult-child sex will be commonplace and it too will be declared a love which is blessed by the god of the harlot church.
There’s a reason the false church is styled by Christ as a harlot. The common imagery of a harlot is a prostitute. For the prostitute, no sexual act is out of the question if you meet the price. For the spiritual harlot, no lifestyle is unacceptable if the money and adoration of her is met. Inclusivity is a core tenet of the harlot church. The god of the harlot church seeks to get all to the table of equality. This mission to include all (while using John 3:16 as bait) means that the numbers will swell to even greater heights and thus continue the ruse of authenticity.
Last, but certainly not least, the harlot church is not afraid to use scripture. You’ll always recognize a member of the harlot church because they have a scriptural, albeit shallow, answer for any objection to its lies.
-
God says judge not aka “you dont know me”
-
Who is without sin, let him cast the first stone aka “no one qualified to preach truth”
-
Touch not the Lords anointed aka “dont put you mouth on the mand of gawd”
-
The only command from Jesus is to love aka “homosexuality is natural”
Thus, the harlot church uses the scripture only as a defense for her agenda of death and perversion.
Related:
